Like many things in life, there are many little things in mathematics that we take for granted. We hardly take a moment to look at them, see the beauty that they contain and that they create. The Division Algorithm, I think, is one of those beautiful little pieces in mathematics that deserves to be mentioned.
Let $a$ and $b$ be integers with $b > 0$. Then there exist unique integers $q$ and $r$ such that
$$ a = bq + r $$
where $0 \leq r < b$
This is so simple and obvious that we never bothered why is it even true.
Existence of $q$ and $r$
We deal with the uniqueness later on. Let
$$ S = a - bk : k \in \mathbb{Z}, a - b \geq 0 $$
Now if $0 \in S$ then $a - bk = 0$ and thus $a = bk \Rightarrow r = 0$.
But if $0 \notin S$ then we first show $S$ is non-empty. If $a$ is positive, $a - b \cdot 0 = a \in S$. If $a$ is negative,
$$ a - b(2a) = a(1 - 2b) \in S $$
We see that $S$ is non-empty either way.
Let's recall the Well ordering principle which states: Every non-empty set of natural numbers contains a minimum element, that is, it is well ordered.
Following the principle, $S$ must have a minimum element, say $r$. Let,
$$ r = a - bq \Rightarrow a = bq + r,\quad r \geq 0 $$
We now show $r < b$. Suppose $r > b$, then:
$$ r - b = a - bq - b = a - b(q + 1) $$
which is of the form $a - bk$. Thus, $r - b \in S$ and obviously $r - b < r$.
But this contradicts the fact that $r$ is the smallest in $S$, led by our assumption $r > b$. Thus, $r < b$. This proves the existence of $q$ and $r$ such that:
$$ a = bq + r,\quad 0 \leq r < b $$
Uniqueness of $q$ and $r$
Suppose we have another pair $q'$ and $r'$ such that:
$$ a = bq' + r',\quad 0 \leq r' < b $$
Then,
$$ bq + r = bq' + r' \Rightarrow b(q - q') = r - r' $$
Let $r > r'$, then we have $b$ dividing $r - r'$, but:
$$ 0 \leq r - r' \leq r < b $$
This is possible only if $r - r' = 0$. Thus, $r' = r$ and $q' = q$.
Conclusion
The seemingly can-be-taken-for-granted statement involves pretty beautiful and not very straightforward proof. So much to learn from mathematics! I hope this was an interesting read.
NOTE: The proof comes from Abstract Algebra Theory and Applications